Read

What is A Clockwork Orange really supposed to be about?

clockwork_orange_getty_ringer.jpg

“A Clockwork Orange,” a dystopian novel by Anthony Burgess published in 1962 and movie adaptation by Stanley Kubrick, follows the story of the protagonist, Alex, a charismatic but deeply troubled teenager. Alongside his gang of “droogs,” he engages in “ultra-violence,” participating in a horrific spree of assault, robbery, and beatings. However, the plot takes a sharp turn when Alex’s criminal life leads to his capture and subsequent exposure to an experimental behavior modification treatment known as the Ludovico Technique. This unconventional method, aimed at curbing his violent inclinations, puts him through a harrowing transformation, altering his inherent character and behavior.

However, the story of “A Clockwork Orange” extends far beyond its plot, incorporating numerous thematic elements that contribute to its status as a controversial classic. The film’s narrative deftly ties these themes into a compelling, if disturbing, exploration of societal norms, the human condition, and our individual and collective morality. The plot serves as a gateway, inviting viewers into a broader discourse around these critical, enduring themes.

Free Will and Morality: The narrative uses Alex’s journey to explore the essence of human morality and free will. At the start, Alex is free to choose his path, though he often selects one of violence and cruelty. However, after being subjected to the Ludovico Technique, his ability to choose is removed. His violent tendencies are suppressed, forcing him to react with sickness to thoughts of violence. The cost, however, is his freedom of choice, and arguably, his humanity. Burgess seems to argue that morality is not true morality if it’s enforced; moral behavior should arise from choice, not compulsion. A society that suppresses the choice between good and evil robs people of their humanity, reducing them to “clockwork oranges” - outwardly organic and human, but mechanistic and predictable inside.

State Control: Burgess critiques a society where the state seeks to exert total control over its individuals, manipulating their behavior to foster societal order. The government uses the violent, antisocial Alex to test the Ludovico Technique, showcasing their willingness to sacrifice individual rights for societal peace. However, the narrative suggests that such control can be just as harmful as the chaos it seeks to avoid. In manipulating its citizens and stripping them of their free will, the state becomes a different kind of ‘ultra-violent’ entity itself.

Youth Culture and Violence: Alex and his “droogs” embody a disturbing vision of youth, one marked by nihilism, violence, and a disdain for societal norms. This brutality is not driven by survival or necessity but seemingly by boredom, thrill, and a profound disconnection from societal norms and values. The teen‘s behavior reflects a broader societal issue - the disconnect between youth and society, and the potential dangers of ignoring this divide. Alex’s love for classical music, especially Beethoven, and his eloquent manner of speech contrast sharply with his violent behavior, underscoring the dichotomy within his character and, by extension, within youth culture. This paradox serves to challenge the stereotypical view of delinquency, demonstrating that intellectual and cultural refinement can coexist with extreme violence.

Rehabilitation vs. Punishment: Burgess uses Alex’s transformation to question the criminal justice system’s approach to dealing with offenders. The prison initially punishes Alex, but the state later attempts to ‘rehabilitate’ him through the Ludovico Technique. The narrative critiques this dichotomy of punishment and forced rehabilitation, suggesting that neither extreme genuinely aids the individual in personal growth or redemption. Alex becomes a passive subject, robbed of his agency and capacity to change of his own accord.

The Nature of Evil: Through Alex, the narrative explores the disturbing notion that evil can be inherently rewarding. Alex takes pleasure in his violent actions; he relishes the power and control he exerts over his victims. This raises profound questions about the roots of evil and the motivations behind malevolent actions. It challenges the traditional view that evil acts are always externally driven or are the result of situational forces. Instead, the narrative suggests that evil can originate from within the individual, intertwined with their personal desires and pleasures. The novel also delves into the concept of relative evil. While Alex’s violent acts are undeniably evil, the state’s treatment of Alex, stripping him of his free will and capacity for choice through the Ludovico Technique, can also be seen as a form of institutional evil. This juxtaposition of individual and institutional evil raises the question of which is more horrifying – an individual who chooses to commit evil acts or a society that justifies evil means for perceived good ends?

The Cyclical Nature of Violence: The narrative underscores the cyclical nature of violence and societal response. Initially, Alex is a perpetrator of violence, yet, after his transformation through the Ludovico Technique, he becomes a victim - first of his past victims and then of the state that seeks to use him as a political tool. This cycle exposes the irony and hypocrisy in societal and institutional practices, highlighting that violence begets violence, and that institutionalized cruelty can sometimes rival or even exceed individual acts of violence.

Each of these themes collectively creates a tapestry of commentary on society, institutions, and individual nature, making “A Clockwork Orange” a deeply philosophical and thought-provoking work.

In essence, “A Clockwork Orange” serves as a canvas for Burgess to critique societal norms and structures while exploring the complexities of human nature and morality. It’s a stark reminder of the dangers of extremes – extreme freedom leading to anarchic violence, and extreme control leading to dehumanization. Ultimately, Burgess seems to argue for a balance, a society where individuals can express their free will within a framework that discourages destructive behavior. The fundamental essence of being human, the narrative suggests, lies in our capacity to choose between good and evil, to learn and grow from our experiences.

“A Clockwork Orange” is a disturbing yet profound exploration of human nature, societal structures, and moral dilemmas. It’s a story that, in its brutal honesty, holds up a mirror to society, prompting introspection about our understanding of morality, free will, state control, rehabilitation, and the nature of evil.